Scandinavian Working Papers in Business Administration

Discussion Papers,
Norwegian School of Economics, Department of Business and Management Science

No 2025/23: Technical versus Environmental Efficiency in Steel Production: A Global Perspective

Giacomo Benini (), Erik Enstad (), Amare Alemaye Mersha () and Luca Rossini ()
Additional contact information
Giacomo Benini: Dept. of Business and Management Science, Norwegian School of Economics, Postal: NHH , Department of Business and Management Science, Helleveien 30, N-5045 Bergen, Norway
Erik Enstad: Dept. of Business and Management Science, Norwegian School of Economics, Postal: NHH , Department of Business and Management Science, Helleveien 30, N-5045 Bergen, Norway
Amare Alemaye Mersha: Dept. of Economics, University of Milan, Postal: University of Milan, Department of Economics, Management and Quantitative Methods, Via Conservatorio 7, , 20122, Milan, Italy
Luca Rossini: Dept. of Economics, University of Milan, Postal: University of Milan, Department of Economics, Management and Quantitative Methods, Via Conservatorio 7, , 20122, Milan, Italy

Abstract: This study provides the first global, plant-level assessment of both technical and environmental efficiency in steel production using a novel micro-dataset covering 147 steel mills across 50 countries from 2019 to 2023. Applying a Stochastic Directional Distance Function, we estimate each plant’s distance to the production frontier and compute the shadow price of CO2e emissions. Our results reveal a robust negative correlation between inefficiency and marginal abatement cost: technically efficient electric arc furnace (EAF) mini-mills — particularly prevalent in North America — display low inefficiency scores (∼0.2) and face high marginal abatement costs (up to 13.4 USD/ton). Conversely, integrated plants in developing countries often operate inefficiently (scores up to ∼0.8) but can abate emissions at very low cost (∼0.4 USD/ton), with Europe positioned between these two extremes. Estimated shadow prices are consistently lower than prevailing carbon market rates, highlighting a systemic under-valuation of emissions in the absence of regulatory pressure. This underpricing, in turn, reflects the highly uneven technological and economic conditions across steel plants worldwide, reinforcing the need for climate policies that account for both efficiency levels and plant configurations, and that tailor interventions to the specific costs and capacities of decarbonization.

Keywords: Environmental Efficiency; Shadow Price of Emissions; Steel Industry; Stochastic Directional Distance Function; Technical Efficiency

JEL-codes: Q50

Language: English

28 pages, August 3, 2025

Full text files

3211422 PDF-file Full text

Download statistics

Questions (including download problems) about the papers in this series should be directed to Stein Fossen ()
Report other problems with accessing this service to Sune Karlsson ().

RePEc:hhs:nhhfms:2025_023This page generated on 2025-08-04 04:36:11.